Saveleva Larisa Anatolieva
Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Gymnastics
Educational organization: Lesgaft National State University of Physical Culture, Sports and Health, St. Petersburg, Russia
Botova Lyubov Nikolaevna
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Gymnastics, Acting head of department
Educational organization: Volga Region State Academy of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism, Kazan, Russia

Experts in artistic gymnastics are constantly analyzing the outcomes of the gymnasts' performance at world and continental championships. However, the analyses cover only the assessment of the final scores of athletes and their ranks. There is a lack of research focused on the structure of routines and components of the scores obtained for the performance of combinations. The purpose of this study was to determine the content of competitive programs performed by the finalists of the World Championship Uneven Bars 2019 and to identify areas for the exercise development in this kind of all-around events on the eve of the Olympic Games.

Methods and organization of the research: we carried out the analysis of video materials of the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG), the analysis of the competition rules for the current Olympic cycle, additional newsletters, and scientific instructional literature. We used an expert assessment method to identify the components of competitive combinations.

Research results. The study determined quantitative indicators of the content of gymnast combinations on uneven bars (the number and difficulty groups of elements, including jumps and dismounts, modal and frequently performed elements, connection value bonus). We have revealed the trend for reduction of the total number of elements of competitive routines. It occurs due to reduction of the number of binders (“dilution”) elements, reduction of the number of elements of difficulty groups below 0.4 points, and increasing number of flight elements performed in a “cascade” way. We have revealed the trend for the use of elements of F (0.6 points) and G (0.7 points) difficulty groups in competitive combinations of the strongest gymnasts, which characterizes a significant increase in the coordination complexity of the programs and increases the requirements for the training of gymnasts.

Conclusion. The research outcomes can provide the basis for predicting competitive programs on uneven bars at the upcoming Olympic Games, making amendments to the system of training gymnasts and the content of combinations to increase competitiveness at major international competitions, as well as making competition rules proposals for the next Olympic cycle.

  1. Arkaev L.Ia., Suchilin. N.G. (2004), “How to train champions” Moscow, Physical Culture and Sports [Fizkultura i sport], 328 p.
  2. Botova, L.N., Yashina, I.A. (2018), “Perspective areas of the content of women’s all-around programs in artistic gymnastics”, Science and Sport: Current Trends [Nauka i sport: sovremennye tendentsii], vol. 21, № 4, pp. 67-72.
  3. Kucherova, I.K., Konstantinova E.A. (2017) “Comparative analysis of competitive  combinations on uneven bars at the Games in London and Rio de Janeiro” Issues of functional training in elite sports [Voprosy funktsionalnoi podgotovki v sporte vysshikh dostizhenii], No. 1, pp. 56-59
  4. Kucherova, I.K., Konstantinova E.A., Kosulina V.V. (2018) “Features of modernization of competitive programs of gymnasts at the Olympics in the XXI century (on the example of uneven bars)”, Theory and practice of Olympic education: traditions and innovations in sports, tourism and the social sphere: proceedings of the IV International Conference on Science and Practice hosted by the South Olympic Academy [Teoriia i praktika olimpiiskogo obrazovaniia: traditsii i innovatsii v sporte, turizme i sotsialnoi sfere : sbornik trudov IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Olimpiiskoi akademii Iuga], Krasnodar, Kuban State University of Physical Culture, Sports and Tourism [Kubanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet fizicheskoi kultury, sporta i turizma], 2018, pp. 121-124.
  5. Terekhina, R.N. Borsienko S.V., Kovrizhnykh N.N. (2017) “The level of special preparedness of the leaders of the gymnastic platform in the first year of the Olympic cycle”, Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta [Academic notes of P.F. Lesgaft university], No. 10 (152), pp. 244 – 248.
  6. Ferreirinha J.E., Silva A.J., Marques A.T. (2008) ‘Evolution of body position in uneven bars routines-influence of “in bar” elements’ //Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance. – Vol.: 10, Issue 4, P.: 386-392.
  7. Ferreirinha J. et al. (2010) ‘The evolution of flight elements in competitive uneven bars routines//Science of Gymnastics Journal. Vol.: 2, Issue 1, P.: 49-60.
  8. Ferreirinha, J. (2007). ‘The external load model in women's artistic gymnastics of high level. The structure and evolution trends of competition routines on uneven bars’. Unpublished PhD Thesis, UTAD, Vila Real.
  9. Huchez A. et al. (2016) ‘Differences between expert and novice gymnasts performance of a counter movement forward in flight on uneven bars’ , Science of Gymnastics Journal.– Vol.: 2, Issue 1, P.: 31-41.
  10. José Ferreirinha et al. (2011) ‘The evolution of real difficulty value of uneven bars routines from elite gymnasts in last 5 Olympic cycles’, Science of gymnastics journal, Vol.: 3 Issue 1, P.: 15-23
  11. Kaur, K., & Koley, S. (2019). ‘Anthropometric determinants of competitive performance in gymnastics: a systematic review’. Int J Health Sci Res9 (7), 249-256.
  12. Kilijanek, K., & Sanchez, K. (2020). ‘History and Overview of Gymnastics Disciplines’. In Gymnastics Medicine (pp. 1-14). Springer, Cham.
  13. Letter № 44 – December 2019 (2019), available at: (accessed 5 January 2020).
  14. 2017-2020 Сode of points. Women`s artistic gymnastics (2016), available at: (accessed 1 December 2019).