Navigation

Article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDICATORS OF PHYSICAL FITNESS OF SCHOOLCHILDREN AGED 9-11 (0.33 Mb, pdf) Read
Authors:
Butrameev Aleksandr Vasilevich
Konovalov Vasilii Nikolaevich
Rudenko Ivan Vladimirovich
Annotation:

The purpose of research – to study the indicators of coordination and condition readiness of schoolchildren aged 9-11 in three age groups. Methods and organization of research. The research involved boys (n = 52) at the age of 9,8 ± 0.8 years, and girls (n = 47) at the age of 10,0 ± 0,8 years. The research was conducted in gymnasium no. 69 and secondary schools no. 99 and no. 144 in the Omsk city. In the context of the study we have used the following methods: analysis of scientific and methodic literature, pedagogical testing, computer stabilometry, methods of mathematical and statistical data processing. Results of the research and discussion. Boys of three age groups significantly differ from girls in terms of speed, speed-power abilities. The girls showed higher rates of flexibility in comparison with boys. We have analyzed the results of stabilometric measurements reflecting the contribution of visual and proprioceptive analyzers to the balance maintaining function. A comparative analysis of statokinetic parameters of boys and girls revealed that girls demonstrate significantly higher length and area of statokinesiogram, velocity of displacement of the pressure center in testing with closed and open eyes than boys do. Conclusion. The outcomes of the research demonstrated that development of motor abilities of schoolchildren aged 9-11 occurs heterochronously. The age of 10 years is a period of explosive growth of speed, speed-power abilities of boys. The age of 11 years for girls is a period of intensive development, and it is favorable for the promotion of speed and coordination abilities.

Bibliography:
  1. Ozolin E.S. Sprint running. Moscow, Human [Chelovek], 2010, 76 p.
  2. Diakova E.Iu., Lalaeva G.S., Mironov A.A. The effectiveness of jumping in the training process of athletes aged 9-10. Bulletin of Tomsk State University [Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta], 2012, pp. 172-174.
  3. Kabanov Iu. M., Stanskii N.T., Trushchenko V.V. Sensitive periods of development of human motor abilities. Vestnik VDU [VDU Bulletin], 2011, no. 2, pp. 94-98.
  4. Guba V.P., Kvashuk P.V., Nikitushkin V.G. Individualization of training young athletes : a tutorial. Moscow, Fizkultura i sport [Physical culture and sport], 2009, 276 p.
  5. Kaledin S.V. Physical training of young athletes., Moscow, Physical culture and sport Publ., 1968, 60 p.
  6. Nikitushkin V.G. Comprehensive control in training of young athletes : monograph. Moscow, Physical culture and sport Publ., 2013, 208 p.
  7. Platonov V.N. Motor qualities and physical training of sportsmen. Moscow, Sport Publ., 2019, 656 p.
  8. Kozhedub M.S., Sevdalev S.V. The value of individualization in designing of the training process of athletes. Sport and physical culture: theoretical and applied aspects of scientific knowledge : proceedings of the III International Conference on science and practice, 2016, pp. 9-11.
  9. Bobkova E.N. Differentiated method of development of speed abilities of boys aged 7 to 15 considering their harmonious physical development : abstr. dis. ... Cand. of Ped. sciences, Smolensk, 2006, 18 p.
  10. Kudinova V.A. Strategy of long-term training of young athletes. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta [Academic notes of P.F. Lesgaft University], 2011, no. 11(81), pp. 80-83.
  11. Zdanevich A.A., Shukevich, L. V. Development of speed and coordination abilities of schoolchildren aged 9 to 10 by means of a game orientation. Fizicheskaia kultura. Sport. Turizm. Dvigatelnaia rekreatsiia [Physical education. Sport. Tourism. Motor recreation], 2016, no. 1, p. 32-37.
  12.  Liakh V.I. Tests in physical education of schoolchildren: a manual for teachers. Мoscow, AST Publ., 1998, 271 p.
  13. Skvortsov D.V. Stabilometric research. Мoscow, Mask Publ, 2010, 176 p.
  14. Ahmad I. Balance Training in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Narrative Review. JSM Diabetol Manag, 2017, 2 (1), pp. 1002-1010.
  15. Horak F.B. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and ageing, 2006, vol. 35, pp. ii7-ii11.
  16. Roncesvalles M., Woollacott M., Burtner P. Neural Factors underlying reduced postural adaptability in children with cerebral palsy. Clin. Neurosci. Neuropathol, 2002, vol.13, pp. 2407-2410.
  17. Schmid M., Conforto S., Lopez L. et al. The development of postural strategies in children: a factorial design study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2005, vol. 2, p. 29.
  18. Era P., Schroll M., Ytting H. et al. Postural balance and its sensory – motor correlates in 75– year–old men and women: A cross-national comparative study. J. Gerontol. Med. Sci., 1996, vol. 51A, pp. 53-63.